linux-kernel - Re: [QUESTION]perf stat: comment of miss ratio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7e93eb7-2ef9-1448-c4ca-7495bc934b32@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 Nov 2019 11:19:30 +0800
From:   Qi Liu <liuqi115@...ilicon.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
        linyunsheng <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION]perf stat: comment of miss ratio



On 2019/11/9 10:47, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>    Relevant code is checked to make sure that the ratio is calculated by
>>
>>    L1-dcache-load-misses/L1-dcache-loads, data "7.58%=30249/399189*100%" also
>>
>>    proves this conclusion.
>>
>>    So, I'm not sure why we use "of all L1-dcache hits" here to describe miss
>>    ratio,
> 
> Yes you're right it should be "of all L1-dcache accesses"
> 
> Please send a patch to fix the string and also check if this isn't wrong with some other
> ratio too.
> 
> -Andi
> 
> .
> 
Hi Andi:
Thanks for your reply firstly.
I check the code and find that "of all...hits" is also used to describe miss ratio of
L1-icache, dTLB cache, iTLB cache, LL-cache. Relevant code as follow:

stat-shadow.c:509:      out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-dcache hits", ratio);
stat-shadow.c:530:      out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all L1-icache hits", ratio);
stat-shadow.c:550:      out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all dTLB cache hits", ratio);
stat-shadow.c:570:      out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all iTLB cache hits", ratio);
stat-shadow.c:590:      out->print_metric(config, out->ctx, color, "%7.2f%%", "of all LL-cache hits", ratio);
stat-shadow.c:875:                      print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-dcache hits", 0);
stat-shadow.c:885:                      print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all L1-icache hits", 0);
stat-shadow.c:895:                      print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all dTLB cache hits", 0);
stat-shadow.c:905:                      print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all iTLB cache hits", 0);
stat-shadow.c:915:                      print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "of all LL-cache hits", 0);

So, may I send a patch to fix all these strings?

Thanks,
liuqi