[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hk188stcy.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:11:09 +0100
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>,
Xingyu Chen <xingyu.chen@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] firmware: meson_sm: Add secure power domain support
Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com> writes:
> The Amlogic Meson A1/C1 Secure Monitor implements calls to control power
> domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c b/drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c
> index 1d5b4d7..7ec09f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ static const struct meson_sm_chip gxbb_chip = {
> CMD(SM_EFUSE_WRITE, 0x82000031),
> CMD(SM_EFUSE_USER_MAX, 0x82000033),
> CMD(SM_GET_CHIP_ID, 0x82000044),
> + CMD(SM_PWRC_SET, 0x82000093),
> + CMD(SM_PWRC_GET, 0x82000095),
> { /* sentinel */ },
> },
> };
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h b/include/linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h
> index 6669e2a..4ed3989 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ enum {
> SM_EFUSE_WRITE,
> SM_EFUSE_USER_MAX,
> SM_GET_CHIP_ID,
> + SM_PWRC_SET,
> + SM_PWRC_GET,
These new IDs are unique to the A1/C1 family. Maybe we should add a
prefix to better indicate that. Maybe:
SM_A1_PWRC_SET,
SM_A1_PWRC_GET,
Thoughts?
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists