lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:49:52 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
        Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>,
        Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac: Add MMC_CAP_ERASE to
 Gen3 SoCs

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:48:08PM +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> From: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> 
> Enable MMC_CAP_ERASE capability in the driver to allow
> erase/discard/trim requests.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> [erosca: Forward-port and test on v5.4-rc7 using H3ULCB-KF:
>          "blkdiscard /dev/mmcblk0" passes with this patch applied
>          and complains otherwise:
> 	 "BLKDISCARD ioctl failed: Operation not supported"]
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>

Looks good to me. Just a generic question, probably more for Ulf:

Why does this CAP_ERASE exist? As I understand, the driver only needs to
set the flag and no further handling is required. Why would a driver not
set this flag and not support erase/trim commands?

Kind regards,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ