[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFq8oVk26ruNA_R8HDXhMGKhDeHnL0q82xi40g1aeo109A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:56:23 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>,
Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac: Add MMC_CAP_ERASE to
Gen3 SoCs
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 21:49, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:48:08PM +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > From: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> >
> > Enable MMC_CAP_ERASE capability in the driver to allow
> > erase/discard/trim requests.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> > [erosca: Forward-port and test on v5.4-rc7 using H3ULCB-KF:
> > "blkdiscard /dev/mmcblk0" passes with this patch applied
> > and complains otherwise:
> > "BLKDISCARD ioctl failed: Operation not supported"]
> > Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
>
> Looks good to me. Just a generic question, probably more for Ulf:
>
> Why does this CAP_ERASE exist? As I understand, the driver only needs to
> set the flag and no further handling is required. Why would a driver not
> set this flag and not support erase/trim commands?
I am working on removing the cap, altogether. Step by step, this is
getting closer now.
The main problem has been about busy detect timeouts, as an erase
command may have a very long busy timeout. On the host side, they
typically need to respect the cmd->busy_timeout for the request, and
if it can't because of some HW limitation, it needs to set
mmc->max_busy_timeout.
Once that is fixed for all, we can drop CAP_ERASE.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists