[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114113743.GA19656@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:43 +0100
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>,
Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac: Add MMC_CAP_ERASE to
Gen3 SoCs
Hi everyone,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 21:49, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:48:08PM +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > > From: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> > >
> > > Enable MMC_CAP_ERASE capability in the driver to allow
> > > erase/discard/trim requests.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
> > > [erosca: Forward-port and test on v5.4-rc7 using H3ULCB-KF:
> > > "blkdiscard /dev/mmcblk0" passes with this patch applied
> > > and complains otherwise:
> > > "BLKDISCARD ioctl failed: Operation not supported"]
> > > Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
> >
> > Looks good to me. Just a generic question, probably more for Ulf:
> >
> > Why does this CAP_ERASE exist? As I understand, the driver only needs to
> > set the flag and no further handling is required. Why would a driver not
> > set this flag and not support erase/trim commands?
>
> I am working on removing the cap, altogether. Step by step, this is
> getting closer now.
>
> The main problem has been about busy detect timeouts, as an erase
> command may have a very long busy timeout. On the host side, they
> typically need to respect the cmd->busy_timeout for the request, and
> if it can't because of some HW limitation, it needs to set
> mmc->max_busy_timeout.
FWIW we've discussed such concerns internally, based on past commits
which either disable [1-2] busy timeouts or increase their value [3].
To get a feeling if this is relevant for R-Car3, I've run blkdiscard on
a 64 GiB eMMC without noticing any issues on v5.4-rc7. Hopefully this
is sufficient as testing?
>
> Once that is fixed for all, we can drop CAP_ERASE.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
[1] 93caf8e69eac76 ("omap_hsmmc: add erase capability")
[2] b13d1f0f9ad64b ("mmc: omap: Add erase capability")
[3] ec30f11e821f2d ("mmc: rtsx_usb: Use the provided busy timeout from the mmc core")
--
Best Regards,
Eugeniu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists