[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0fe03eb-86c9-8c67-684e-b1f6f606b7ed@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:45:18 +0200
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <ohad@...ery.com>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] remoteproc/omap: add support for system
suspend/resume
On 12/11/2019 08:15, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 28 Oct 05:42 PDT 2019, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> [..]
>> +static int _omap_rproc_suspend(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> I think it would make sense to inline this and _omap_rproc_resume() in
> their single call sites.
Well, these get re-used in following patch for runtime PM also, so it is
probably better leave this for compiler to decide?
>
> [..]
>> +static int _omap_rproc_resume(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
> [..]
>> @@ -806,6 +972,14 @@ static int omap_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> oproc->num_timers);
>> }
>>
>> + init_completion(&oproc->pm_comp);
>> +
>> + oproc->fck = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>
> devm_clk_get() ?
>
> Otherwise I think you're lacking a clk_put() in omap_rproc_remove()
Yeah, let me replace with devm_clk_get.
-Tero
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists