[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1573564580-9006-7-git-send-email-rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:16:19 -0800
From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>
To: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
m.tretter@...gutronix.de, jolly.shah@...inx.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tejas.patel@...inx.com, nava.manne@...inx.com,
ravi.patel@...inx.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] clk: zynqmp: Add support for clock with CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO flag
From: Tejas Patel <tejas.patel@...inx.com>
Existing clock divider functions is not checking for
base of divider. So, if any clock divider is power of 2
then clock rate calculation will be wrong.
Add support to calculate divider value for the clocks
with CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO flag.
Signed-off-by: Tejas Patel <tejas.patel@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>
---
drivers/clk/zynqmp/divider.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/divider.c b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/divider.c
index b564696..67aa88c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/divider.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/divider.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/*
* Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC Divider support
*
- * Copyright (C) 2016-2018 Xilinx
+ * Copyright (C) 2016-2019 Xilinx
*
* Adjustable divider clock implementation
*/
@@ -45,9 +45,26 @@ struct zynqmp_clk_divider {
};
static inline int zynqmp_divider_get_val(unsigned long parent_rate,
- unsigned long rate)
+ unsigned long rate, u16 flags)
{
- return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(parent_rate, rate);
+ int up, down;
+ unsigned long up_rate, down_rate;
+
+ if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO) {
+ up = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
+ down = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
+
+ up = __roundup_pow_of_two(up);
+ down = __rounddown_pow_of_two(down);
+
+ up_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, up);
+ down_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, down);
+
+ return (rate - up_rate) <= (down_rate - rate) ? up : down;
+
+ } else {
+ return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(parent_rate, rate);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -79,6 +96,9 @@ static unsigned long zynqmp_clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
else
value = div >> 16;
+ if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
+ value = 1 << value;
+
if (!value) {
WARN(!(divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO),
"%s: Zero divisor and CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO not set\n",
@@ -157,10 +177,13 @@ static long zynqmp_clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
else
bestdiv = bestdiv >> 16;
+ if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
+ bestdiv = 1 << bestdiv;
+
return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)*prate, bestdiv);
}
- bestdiv = zynqmp_divider_get_val(*prate, rate);
+ bestdiv = zynqmp_divider_get_val(*prate, rate, divider->flags);
/*
* In case of two divisors, compute best divider values and return
@@ -198,7 +221,7 @@ static int zynqmp_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
int ret;
const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops = zynqmp_pm_get_eemi_ops();
- value = zynqmp_divider_get_val(parent_rate, rate);
+ value = zynqmp_divider_get_val(parent_rate, rate, divider->flags);
if (div_type == TYPE_DIV1) {
div = value & 0xFFFF;
div |= 0xffff << 16;
@@ -207,6 +230,9 @@ static int zynqmp_clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
div |= value << 16;
}
+ if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
+ div = __ffs(div);
+
ret = eemi_ops->clock_setdivider(clk_id, div);
if (ret)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists