linux-kernel - [RESEND Patch v3 10/20] media: ti-vpe: cal: Fix pixel processing parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191112145347.23519-11-bparrot@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:53:37 -0600
From:   Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Subject: [RESEND Patch v3 10/20] media: ti-vpe: cal: Fix pixel processing parameters

The pixel processing unit was hard coded to only handle 8 bits per pixel
from input to output.

We now add handling for 10, 12 and 16 bits per pixel at the source and
setting the in-memory size (i.e. container size) to 16 bits for these 3
cases.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
---
 drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
index 51edc7bc3135..1b4a74f0d751 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c
@@ -800,13 +800,48 @@ static void csi2_ctx_config(struct cal_ctx *ctx)
 
 static void pix_proc_config(struct cal_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	u32 val;
+	u32 val, extract, pack;
+
+	switch (ctx->fmt->bpp) {
+	case 8:
+		extract = CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B8;
+		pack = CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B8;
+		break;
+	case 10:
+		extract = CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B10_MIPI;
+		pack = CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B16;
+		break;
+	case 12:
+		extract = CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B12_MIPI;
+		pack = CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B16;
+		break;
+	case 16:
+		extract = CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B16_LE;
+		pack = CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B16;
+		break;
+	default:
+		/*
+		 * If you see this warning then it means that you added
+		 * some new entry in the cal_formats[] array with a different
+		 * bit per pixel values then the one supported below.
+		 * Either add support for the new bpp value below or adjust
+		 * the new entry to use one of the value below.
+		 *
+		 * Instead of failing here just use 8 bpp as a default.
+		 */
+		dev_warn_once(&ctx->dev->pdev->dev,
+			      "%s:%d:%s: bpp:%d unsupported! Overwritten with 8.\n",
+			      __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, ctx->fmt->bpp);
+		extract = CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B8;
+		pack = CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B8;
+		break;
+	}
 
 	val = reg_read(ctx->dev, CAL_PIX_PROC(ctx->csi2_port));
-	set_field(&val, CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_B8, CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_MASK);
+	set_field(&val, extract, CAL_PIX_PROC_EXTRACT_MASK);
 	set_field(&val, CAL_PIX_PROC_DPCMD_BYPASS, CAL_PIX_PROC_DPCMD_MASK);
 	set_field(&val, CAL_PIX_PROC_DPCME_BYPASS, CAL_PIX_PROC_DPCME_MASK);
-	set_field(&val, CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_B8, CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_MASK);
+	set_field(&val, pack, CAL_PIX_PROC_PACK_MASK);
 	set_field(&val, ctx->csi2_port, CAL_PIX_PROC_CPORT_MASK);
 	set_field(&val, CAL_GEN_ENABLE, CAL_PIX_PROC_EN_MASK);
 	reg_write(ctx->dev, CAL_PIX_PROC(ctx->csi2_port), val);
-- 
2.17.1