linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:46:47 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...ux.intel.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:11 AM Rahul Tanwar
<rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Add dt bindings document for pinmux & GPIO controller driver of
> Intel Lightning Mountain SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
(...)

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: intel,lgm-pinctrl

Just noted from another review where Rob noted that this name should
match the internal name in the datasheet for this hardware block. Is it
really called "lgm-pinctrl" inside Intel?

intel,lightning-mountain-io and similar are perfectly fine if that is the
name it has in your documentation.

Yours,
Linus Walleij