linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d3be294-5f12-462c-855c-e53ecb9190b7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:27:31 +0800
From:   "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...ux.intel.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC


Hi Linus,

On 13/11/2019 10:46 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:11 AM Rahul Tanwar
> <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Add dt bindings document for pinmux & GPIO controller driver of
>> Intel Lightning Mountain SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
> (...)
>
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: intel,lgm-pinctrl
> Just noted from another review where Rob noted that this name should
> match the internal name in the datasheet for this hardware block. Is it
> really called "lgm-pinctrl" inside Intel?
>
> intel,lightning-mountain-io and similar are perfectly fine if that is the
> name it has in your documentation.

Our documentation does not have any specific names for these hardware
blocks. It names it in a very generic/standard manner like GPIO, pinmux..

To make the name explicit & self explanatory, i should probably change
the name as you suggested i.e. intel,lightning-mountain-io.

Regards,
Rahul