linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] spi: s3c64xx: Use dma_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:40:49 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, andi@...zian.org,
        ldewangan@...dia.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, vkoul@...nel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] spi: s3c64xx: Use dma_request_chan() directly for
 channel request

Hi Peter,

>  	if (!is_polling(sdd)) {
>  		/* Acquire DMA channels */
> -		sdd->rx_dma.ch = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(&pdev->dev,
> -								  "rx");
> +		sdd->rx_dma.ch = dma_request_chan(&pdev->dev, "rx");

I have a little concern here. We have two funcions
'dma_request_chan' and  'dma_request_channel' don't we end up
making some confusion here?

Wouldn't it make more sense renaming 'dma_request_chan' to
'dma_request_slave_channel_reason'?

Thanks,
Andi