[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114043540.GH952516@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:05:40 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, andi@...zian.org,
ldewangan@...dia.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
kgene@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] spi: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel
request
On 13-11-19, 11:42, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
> is just:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> dma_request_chan(dev, name)
Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists