linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Allow restricting permissions in /proc/sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191113010400.GV11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:04:00 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" 
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow restricting permissions in /proc/sys

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:19:00PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:35:46AM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> Is a v2 of this patch needed? It wasn't clear to me if the inode modes
> were incorrectly cached...?

I provided a review for it just now. The patch is cleaner but I believe
it can be split up, and also I am not yet sure it is correct. You were
CC'd on it but the subject was not clear that it was a V2.

Topi, if you send a V3 can you please prefix the subject with this?

  Luis