| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191113084137.GI2770@kitsune.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:41:37 +0100
From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Brajeswar Ghosh <brajeswar.linux@...il.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gustavo Romero <gromero@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Jagadeesh Pagadala <jagdsh.linux@...il.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/33] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 01:02:34PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Michal Suchanek's on November 13, 2019 2:52 am:
> > There are numerous references to 32bit functions in generic and 64bit
> > code so ifdef them out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
>
> For the most part these seem okay to me.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > index 45f1d5e54671..35874119b398 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -44,16 +44,16 @@ CFLAGS_btext.o += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > endif
> >
> > obj-y := cputable.o ptrace.o syscalls.o \
> > - irq.o align.o signal_32.o pmc.o vdso.o \
> > + irq.o align.o signal_$(BITS).o pmc.o vdso.o \
> > process.o systbl.o idle.o \
> > signal.o sysfs.o cacheinfo.o time.o \
> > prom.o traps.o setup-common.o \
> > udbg.o misc.o io.o misc_$(BITS).o \
> > of_platform.o prom_parse.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o sys_ppc32.o \
> > - signal_64.o ptrace32.o \
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o \
> > paca.o nvram_64.o firmware.o note.o \
> > syscall_64.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += sys_ppc32.o ptrace32.o signal_32.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VDSO32) += vdso32/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG) += watchdog.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > index 00173cc904ef..c339a984958f 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -52,8 +52,10 @@
> > SYS_CALL_TABLE:
> > .tc sys_call_table[TC],sys_call_table
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > COMPAT_SYS_CALL_TABLE:
> > .tc compat_sys_call_table[TC],compat_sys_call_table
> > +#endif
> >
> > /* This value is used to mark exception frames on the stack. */
> > exception_marker:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > index 60436432399f..61678cb0e6a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save();
> > struct ksignal ksig = { .sig = 0 };
> > int ret;
> > - int is32 = is_32bit_task();
> >
> > BUG_ON(tsk != current);
> >
> > @@ -277,7 +276,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >
> > rseq_signal_deliver(&ksig, tsk->thread.regs);
> >
> > - if (is32) {
> > + if (is_32bit_task()) {
> > if (ksig.ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> > ret = handle_rt_signal32(&ksig, oldset, tsk);
> > else
>
> This is just a clean up I guess.
It also expands directly to if(0) or if(1) for the !COMPAT cases. I am
not sure how it would work with the intermediate variable.
There was more complex change initially but after some additional
cleanups removing the variable is the only part left.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > index d00cfc4a39a9..319ebd4f494d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ typedef long (*syscall_fn)(long, long, long, long, long, long);
> >
> > long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8, unsigned long r0, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - unsigned long ti_flags;
> > syscall_fn f;
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S))
> > @@ -64,8 +63,7 @@ long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8,
> >
> > __hard_irq_enable();
> >
> > - ti_flags = current_thread_info()->flags;
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > + if (unlikely(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > /*
> > * We use the return value of do_syscall_trace_enter() as the
> > * syscall number. If the syscall was rejected for any reason
> > @@ -81,7 +79,7 @@ long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8,
> > /* May be faster to do array_index_nospec? */
> > barrier_nospec();
> >
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_32BIT)) {
> > + if (unlikely(is_32bit_task())) {
> > f = (void *)compat_sys_call_table[r0];
> >
> > r3 &= 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
>
> I guess this is okay, I did want to be careful about where ti_flags
> was loaded exactly, but I think DOTRACE and 32BIT are not volatile.
> Is it possible to define _TIF_32BIT to zero for 64-bit !compat case
> and have the original branch eliminated, or does that cause other
> problems?
is_32bit_task() expands to 0 or 1 constant unless CONFIG_COMPAT is set.
That's why the test needs replacing here.
Unsetting _TIF_32BIT might also be feasible but it is not necessary.
Thanks
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists