[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191113095353.GA5937@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:53:53 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, alan.cox@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
pengfei.xu@...el.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Use per-device dma_ops
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Indeed. And one idea would be to lift the code in the powerpc
> dma_iommu_ops that check a flag and use the direct ops to the generic
> dma code and a flag in struct device. We can then switch the intel
> iommu ops (and AMD Gart) over to it.
Let me know what you think of the branch below. Only compile tested
and booted on qemu with an emulated intel iommu:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dma-bypass
Powered by blists - more mailing lists