[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191113095548.27704-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:55:48 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] net: sfp: fix spelling mistake "requies" -> "requires"
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
There is a spelling mistake in a dev_warn message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index f9b8051c4247..b0f88c2c0153 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static int sfp_module_parse_power(struct sfp *sfp)
*/
if (sfp->id.ext.diagmon & SFP_DIAGMON_ADDRMODE && power_mW > 1000) {
dev_warn(sfp->dev,
- "Address Change Sequence not supported but module requies %u.%uW, module may not be functional\n",
+ "Address Change Sequence not supported but module requires %u.%uW, module may not be functional\n",
power_mW / 1000, (power_mW / 100) % 10);
return 0;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists