linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: sccg: use relaxed io api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1573638817-4363-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:02:03 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
CC:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: sccg: use relaxed io api

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

It is ok to use relaxed api here, no need to use stronger readl/writel

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
 drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
index 2cf874813458..e03f8acb1e82 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-sccg-pll.c
@@ -106,8 +106,9 @@ static int clk_sccg_pll_wait_lock(struct clk_sccg_pll *pll)
 
 	/* don't wait for lock if all plls are bypassed */
 	if (!(val & SSCG_PLL_BYPASS2_MASK))
-		return readl_poll_timeout(pll->base, val, val & PLL_LOCK_MASK,
-						0, PLL_SCCG_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
+		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pll->base, val,
+						  val & PLL_LOCK_MASK,
+						  0, PLL_SCCG_LOCK_TIMEOUT);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -349,7 +350,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_sccg_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 
 	temp64 = parent_rate;
 
-	val = readl(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 	if (val & SSCG_PLL_BYPASS2_MASK) {
 		temp64 = parent_rate;
 	} else if (val & SSCG_PLL_BYPASS1_MASK) {
@@ -372,10 +373,10 @@ static int clk_sccg_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 	u32 val;
 
 	/* set bypass here too since the parent might be the same */
-	val = readl(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 	val &= ~SSCG_PLL_BYPASS_MASK;
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(SSCG_PLL_BYPASS_MASK, setup->bypass);
-	writel(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 
 	val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG2);
 	val &= ~(PLL_DIVF1_MASK | PLL_DIVF2_MASK);
@@ -396,7 +397,7 @@ static u8 clk_sccg_pll_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
 	u32 val;
 	u8 ret = pll->parent;
 
-	val = readl(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 	if (val & SSCG_PLL_BYPASS2_MASK)
 		ret = pll->bypass2;
 	else if (val & SSCG_PLL_BYPASS1_MASK)
@@ -409,10 +410,10 @@ static int clk_sccg_pll_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
 	struct clk_sccg_pll *pll = to_clk_sccg_pll(hw);
 	u32 val;
 
-	val = readl(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 	val &= ~SSCG_PLL_BYPASS_MASK;
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(SSCG_PLL_BYPASS_MASK, pll->setup.bypass);
-	writel(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
+	writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
 
 	return clk_sccg_pll_wait_lock(pll);
 }
-- 
2.16.4