lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115175224.ozuiei2vlfvynok5@treble>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:52:24 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Speed booting by sorting ORC unwind tables at
 build time

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:45:32AM +0800, Shile Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I refactored the code, followed by Peter's suggestions in v3, thank you!
> Any suggestions and comments are welcome!
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Changelog:
> ==========
> v3->v4:
> - Code refactored for Peter's review findings and suggestions.

Hi Shile,

I haven't given it a proper review yet, but one minor suggestion.  In
general it's good practice to wait at least a few business days before
posting a new version of a patch set.  That way it gives people time to
review, and it also helps to avoid flooding people's inboxes.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ