lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:57:10 +0800
From:   Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Speed booting by sorting ORC unwind tables at
 build time



On 2019/11/16 01:52, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:45:32AM +0800, Shile Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I refactored the code, followed by Peter's suggestions in v3, thank you!
>> Any suggestions and comments are welcome!
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Changelog:
>> ==========
>> v3->v4:
>> - Code refactored for Peter's review findings and suggestions.
> Hi Shile,
>
> I haven't given it a proper review yet, but one minor suggestion.  In
> general it's good practice to wait at least a few business days before
> posting a new version of a patch set.  That way it gives people time to
> review, and it also helps to avoid flooding people's inboxes.
>

Hi, Josh,

Thank you very much for your kindly reminder!
I got it and very sorry for that flooding.

Best regards!

--- Shile

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ