[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115201256.GQ4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:12:56 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, xiezhipeng1@...wei.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 07:00:45PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 18:44, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Because we don't care about the rt,dl,irq decay anywhere else either. We
> > only call cpufreq_update_util() for rq->cfs changes.
>
> cpufreq_update_util is called for each enqueue/dequeue of rt/dl tasks
Oh indeed.. OK, so then I suppose rt,dl,cfs makes some sense.
Let me sleep on it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists