[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a925548b8ead7c3b5ddf2d7bf3de05d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:03:37 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] scsi: ufs: Fix up auto hibern8 enablement
On 2019-11-15 14:35, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi Can,
>
> On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 22:09 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
>> + if (hba->ahit != ahit)
>> + hba->ahit = ahit;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
>> + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) {
>
> Always do pm_runtime_get_sync() here could avoid possible racing?
>
> And thus AH8 could be enabled regardless of runtime status.
>
>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
>> + ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
>> + ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(hba);
>> + ufshcd_release(hba);
>> + pm_runtime_put(hba->dev);
>> + }
>> }
>
> Thanks,
> Stanley
Hi Stanley,
if !pm_runtime_suspended() is true, hba->dev's runtime status, other
than RPM_ACTIVE,
may be RPM_SUSPENDING or RPM_RESUMING. So, here for safty, do
pm_runtime_get_sync() once
before access registers, in case we hit corner cases in which powers
and/or clocks are OFF.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists