[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1573802311.4956.8.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:18:31 +0800
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
<rnayak@...eaurora.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...roid.com>, <saravanak@...gle.com>,
<salyzyn@...gle.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] scsi: ufs: Fix up auto hibern8 enablement
Hi Can,
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 15:03 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2019-11-15 14:35, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > Hi Can,
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 22:09 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
> >> + if (hba->ahit != ahit)
> >> + hba->ahit = ahit;
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> >> + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) {
> >
> > Always do pm_runtime_get_sync() here could avoid possible racing?
> >
> > And thus AH8 could be enabled regardless of runtime status.
> >
> >> + pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
> >> + ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
> >> + ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(hba);
> >> + ufshcd_release(hba);
> >> + pm_runtime_put(hba->dev);
> >> + }
> >> }
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stanley
>
> Hi Stanley,
>
> if !pm_runtime_suspended() is true, hba->dev's runtime status, other
> than RPM_ACTIVE,
> may be RPM_SUSPENDING or RPM_RESUMING. So, here for safty, do
> pm_runtime_get_sync() once
> before access registers, in case we hit corner cases in which powers
> and/or clocks are OFF.
>
Thanks for explanation.
I fully understand the intention of this patch.
Just wonder if "if (!pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev))" could be removed
and then always do pm_runtime_get_sync() here.
This could avoid possible racing and enable AH8 regardless of current
runtime status.
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.
Thanks,
Stanley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists