[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191117180847.322467cqngpbpael@cantor>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:08:47 -0700
From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Move setting of TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ into
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single
On Sat Nov 16 19, Stefan Berger wrote:
>On 11/14/19 11:44 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>>On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:27:25PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>>From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>>Move the setting of the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ for irq probing into
>>>>tpm_tis_probe_irq_single before calling tpm_tis_gen_interrupt.
>>>>This move handles error conditions better that may arise if anything
>>>>before fails in tpm_tis_probe_irq_single.
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>>>Suggested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
>>>What about just changing the condition?
>>Also cannot take this since it is not a bug (no fixes tag).
>
>I'll repost but will wait until Jerry has tested it on that machine.
>
> Stefan
>
Sorry, I'm still waiting to hear back from the reporter, and logistics
for some reason has been silent on my request so far.
>
>>
>>/Jarkko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists