[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <185664a9-58f2-2a4b-4e6b-8d7750a35690@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 09:32:06 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, jsnitsel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Move setting of TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ into
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single
On 11/14/19 11:44 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:27:25PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Move the setting of the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ for irq probing into
>>> tpm_tis_probe_irq_single before calling tpm_tis_gen_interrupt.
>>> This move handles error conditions better that may arise if anything
>>> before fails in tpm_tis_probe_irq_single.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
>> What about just changing the condition?
> Also cannot take this since it is not a bug (no fixes tag).
I'll repost but will wait until Jerry has tested it on that machine.
Stefan
>
> /Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists