linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Update VCCQ2 and VCCQ min/max voltage hard codes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:15:04 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Can Guo <cang@....qualcomm.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "nguyenb@...eaurora.org" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
        "rnayak@...eaurora.org" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        "salyzyn@...gle.com" <salyzyn@...gle.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Update VCCQ2 and VCCQ min/max voltage
 hard codes

> 
> From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Per UFS 3.0 JEDEC standard, the VCCQ2 min voltage is 1.7v and the VCCQ
> voltage range is 1.14v ~ 1.26v. Update their hard codes accordingly to make
> sure they work in a safe range compliant for ver 1.0/2.0/2.1/3.0 UFS devices.
So to keep it safe, we need to use largest range: 
min_uV = min over all spec ranges, and max_uV = max over all spec ranges.
Meaning leave it as it is if we want to be backward compatible with UFS1.0.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index 385bac8..9df4f4d
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -500,9 +500,9 @@ struct ufs_query_res {
>  #define UFS_VREG_VCC_MAX_UV       3600000 /* uV */
>  #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MIN_UV    1700000 /* uV */
>  #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MAX_UV    1950000 /* uV */
> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV      1100000 /* uV */
> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV      1140000 /* uV */
>  #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MAX_UV      1300000 /* uV */
> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV     1650000 /* uV */
> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV     1700000 /* uV */
>  #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MAX_UV     1950000 /* uV */
> 
>  /*
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project