[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191118143553.GD6363@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:35:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/boot: explicitly place .eh_frame after .rodata
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Ilie Halip wrote:
> When using GCC as compiler and LLVM's lld as linker, linking
> setup.elf fails:
> LD arch/x86/boot/setup.elf
> ld.lld: error: init sections too big!
>
> This happens because ld.lld has different rules for placing
> orphan sections (i.e. sections not mentioned in a linker script)
> compared to ld.bfd.
>
> Particularly, in this case, the merged .eh_frame section is
> placed before __end_init, which triggers an assert in the script.
>
> Explicitly place this section after .rodata, in accordance with
> ld.bfd's behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@...il.com>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/760
> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> * removed wildcard for input sections (.eh_frame* -> .eh_frame)
>
> arch/x86/boot/setup.ld | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/setup.ld b/arch/x86/boot/setup.ld
> index 0149e41d42c2..30ce52635cd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/setup.ld
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/setup.ld
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ SECTIONS
>
> . = ALIGN(16);
> .rodata : { *(.rodata*) }
> + .eh_frame : { *(.eh_frame) }
The kernel proper linker script does
/DISCARD/ : {
*(.eh_frame)
}
with the .eh_frame section.
Wouldn't that solve your issue too, if you add it to the /DISCARD/
section in that linker script too?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists