[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WD4r-GAM6mnTg9qB04aaX7JJzHajhtb+N8Yq9UR1WZAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:19:18 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Set 'active_only' for active only
power domains
Bjorn / Andy,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:36 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The 'active_only' attribute was accidentally never set to true for any
> power domains meaning that all the code handling this attribute was
> dead.
>
> NOTE that the RPM power domain code (as opposed to the RPMh one) gets
> this right.
>
> Fixes: 279b7e8a62cc ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Somehow this fell through the cracks and was never applied. Can you
pick it up? Given that it's been a year and nobody has noticed this
it seems like 5.5 is fine, but maybe you could add Cc: stable since it
seems like something that stable trees would want...
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists