[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA42JLYCod=mymBiDDXxQ1sts7e-Ot_q9SKdJxjSkcsZRVGDTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:44:22 -0800
From: Dexuan-Linux Cui <dexuan.linux@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"hushiyuan@...wei.com" <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
"linfeilong@...wei.com" <linfeilong@...wei.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: sysfs: Change ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:06 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:17 PM Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The commit 0f27cff8597d ("ACPI: sysfs: Make ACPI GPE mask kernel
> > > parameter cover all GPEs") says:
> > > "Use a bitmap of size 0xFF instead of a u64 for the GPE mask so 256
> > > GPEs can be masked"
> > >
> > > But the masking of GPE 0xFF it not supported and the check condition
> > > "gpe > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" is not valid because the type of gpe is
> > > u8.
> > >
> > > So modify the macro ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100, and drop the "gpe >
> > > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" check. In addition, update the docs "Format" for
> > > acpi_mask_gpe parameter.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 0f27cff8597d ("ACPI: sysfs: Make ACPI GPE mask kernel parameter cover all GPEs")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > > - drop the "gpe > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX" check
> > > - update the docs "Format" from <int> to <byte> for acpi_mask_gpe parameter
> > > - update the commit comment
> > >
> > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> > > drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 4 ++--
> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Bisect flags commit eb09878e1301 "ACPI: sysfs: Change
> > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX to 0x100" in -next as the reason for a boot
> > regression in my qemu-kvm test environment. It spews:
> >
> > [ 1.456728] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> > ...
> > [ 161.721420] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
> >
> > ...and then hangs.
> >
> > A straight revert gets the configuration back on its feet.
> >
> > qemu-system-x86_64 --version
> > QEMU emulator version 4.0.50 (v4.0.0-928-g49c6c6ac0cd8)
>
> OK, I'll drop it then, thanks!
We're seeing the same issue wtih 5.4.0-rc7-next-20191118 on a Linux VM
running on Hyper-V :
[ 0.133029] ACPI: 1 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
[ 0.144023] ACPI: Interpreter enabled
[ 0.145023] ACPI: (supports S0 S5)
[ 0.146023] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
[ 0.147024] PCI: Using host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary,
use "pci=nocrs" and report a bug
[ 0.148031] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
...
[ 774.839023] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
[ 774.840023] ACPI: Masking GPE 0x0.
I guess the patch is only tested on a physical machine and not on a VM...
Thanks,
Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists