linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] exfat: add super block operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3bf9fea7-99d3-3a9b-6565-39d62f5ee473@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:32:55 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] exfat: add super block operations

…
> +++ b/fs/exfat/super.c
…
> +static int __exfat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
…
> +free_upcase:
> +	exfat_free_upcase_table(sb);

Label alternatives?
* free_table
* free_upcase_table


…
> +static int exfat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> +{
…
> +	if (EXFAT_SB(sb)->options.case_sensitive)
> +		sb->s_d_op = &exfat_dentry_ops;
> +	else
> +		sb->s_d_op = &exfat_ci_dentry_ops;

How do you think about the usage of conditional operators at similar places?

+	sb->s_d_op = EXFAT_SB(sb)->options.case_sensitive
+		     ? &exfat_dentry_ops;
+		     : &exfat_ci_dentry_ops;


…
> +failed_mount3:
> +	iput(root_inode);

I find the label “put_inode” more appropriate.


…
> +failed_mount2:
> +	exfat_free_upcase_table(sb);

I find the label “free_table” more helpful.


…
> +failed_mount:
> +	if (sbi->nls_io)
> +		unload_nls(sbi->nls_io);

Can the label “check_nls_io” be nicer?


…
> +static int __init init_exfat_fs(void)
> +{
…
> +shutdown_cache:
> +	exfat_cache_shutdown();
> +
> +	return err;

Would you like to omit blank lines at similar places?

Regards,
Markus