linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] exfat: add exfat entry operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:19:01 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] exfat: add exfat entry operations

…
> +++ b/fs/exfat/fatent.c
…
> +int exfat_zeroed_cluster(struct inode *dir, unsigned int clu)
> +{
…
> +error:
> +	exfat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "failed zeroed sect %llu\n",
> +		(unsigned long long)blknr);
…

Can the label “report_failure” be more helpful?


…
> +int exfat_alloc_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int num_alloc,
> +		struct exfat_chain *p_chain)
> +{
…
> +error:
> +	if (num_clusters)
> +		exfat_free_cluster(inode, p_chain);

Can a label like “check_num_clusters” be nicer?

Regards,
Markus