linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 12/29] interconnect: Add memory interconnection providers for NVIDIA Tegra SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <044b17a8-7186-fec0-e786-5ec5a13e5873@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:59:58 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/29] interconnect: Add memory interconnection
 providers for NVIDIA Tegra SoCs

19.11.2019 09:31, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:02:30PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> index 1238e35653d1..593954324259 100644
>> --- a/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> +++ b/include/soc/tegra/mc.h
>> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ struct tegra_mc_reset_ops {
>>  			    const struct tegra_mc_reset *rst);
>>  };
>>  
>> +struct tegra_mc_icc_node {
>> +	const char *name;
>> +	unsigned int id;
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct tegra_mc_soc {
>>  	const struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
>>  	unsigned int num_clients;
>> @@ -160,6 +165,9 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {
>>  	const struct tegra_mc_reset_ops *reset_ops;
>>  	const struct tegra_mc_reset *resets;
>>  	unsigned int num_resets;
>> +
>> +	const struct tegra_mc_icc_node *icc_nodes;
>> +	unsigned int num_icc_nodes;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct tegra_mc {
>> @@ -184,4 +192,22 @@ struct tegra_mc {
>>  int tegra_mc_write_emem_configuration(struct tegra_mc *mc, unsigned long rate);
>>  unsigned int tegra_mc_get_emem_device_count(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_TEGRA
>> +int tegra_icc_mc_setup_interconnect(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>> +int tegra_icc_emc_setup_interconnect(struct device *emc_dev,
>> +				     unsigned int dram_data_bus_width_bytes);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int tegra_icc_mc_setup_interconnect(struct tegra_mc *mc);
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int
>> +tegra_icc_emc_setup_interconnect(struct device *emc_dev,
>> +				 unsigned int dram_data_bus_width_bytes)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
> 
> Is there really any reason why we should make this support optional? It
> seems to me like we would always want this enabled once it's tested and
> known to work.

There is always some room for bugs, should be better to have an option
to disable ICC entirely (IMO).