[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119170006.GA19569@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:00:06 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
phil@...pberrypi.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:57:43PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Hi Rob & Christoph,
> do you mind if I append v2 of this into my upcoming v3 RPi4 PCIe support
> series, I didn't do it initially as I thought this was going to be a
> contentious patch. But as it turned out better than expected, I think it
> should go into the PCIe series. In the end it's the first explicit user of the
> bus DMA limit.
>
> Here's v2 in case you don't know what I'm talking about:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg768459.html
In principle I wouldn't mind, but I think this is going to conflict
quite badly with other changes in the dma-mapping tree (including
yours). So I think we'll need a shared tree or I'll need to pull
in the whole series through the dma-mapping tree if there are not
other conflicts and the other maintainers are fine with it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists