[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911192323310.6731@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:25:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] cpu: Hide cpu_up/down
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019, Qais Yousef wrote:
> -int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> return do_cpu_down(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_down);
The exports should be gone already at this point, right?
> +/*
> + * This function is meant to be used by device core cpu subsystem.
> + *
> + * Other subsystems should use device_offline(get_cpu_device(cpu)) instead.
> + */
Can you please use proper kernel-doc function documentation?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists