[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119223623.y63qalyj6t72saip@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:36:24 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] cpu: Hide cpu_up/down
On 11/19/19 23:25, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2019, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > -int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> > +static int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > return do_cpu_down(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_down);
>
> The exports should be gone already at this point, right?
Yes. The only in-kernel user was the torture test.
> > +/*
> > + * This function is meant to be used by device core cpu subsystem.
> > + *
> > + * Other subsystems should use device_offline(get_cpu_device(cpu)) instead.
> > + */
>
> Can you please use proper kernel-doc function documentation?
Will do.
Thanks
--
Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists