[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98eeec95-cc19-2900-b96e-eadaac1b4a68@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:40:14 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] IMA: Define an IMA hook to measure keys
On 11/20/2019 3:28 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
Hi Eric,
>
> I’m interested in using this patch series, however I get the following on every boot:
> [ 1.222749] Call Trace:
> [ 1.223344] ? crypto_destroy_tfm+0x5f/0xb0
> [ 1.224315] ima_get_action+0x2c/0x30
> [ 1.225148] process_buffer_measurement+0x1da/0x230
> [ 1.226306] ima_post_key_create_or_update+0x3b/0x40
This is happening because IMA is not yet initialized when the IMA hook
is called.
I had the following check in process_buffer_measurement() as part of my
patch, but removed it since it is being upstreamed separately (by Mimi)
if (!ima_policy_flag)
return;
Until this change is in, please add the above line locally on entry to
process_buffer_measurement() to get around the issue.
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists