linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:03:05 -0800
From:   Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys

On 11/20/2019 3:19 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

Hi Mimi,

>> The above can be used to correlate the key measurement IMA entry,
>> ima-sig and ima-modsig entries using the same key.
> 
> True, but associating the public key measurement with the file
> signature requires information from the certificate (e.g. issuer,
> serial number, and/or subject, subject keyid).
> 
> For a regression test, it would be nice if the key measurement,
> itself, contained everything needed in order to validate the file
> signatures in the measurement list.

I am just trying to understand your asks - Please clarify:

1, My change includes only the public key and not the entire certificate 
information in the measured buffer.

Should I update this current patch set to measure the entire cert. Or, 
can that be done as a separate patch set?

2, Should a regression test be part of this patch set for the key 
measurement changes to be accepted?

thanks,
  -lakshmi