[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae58bcc4-cb47-7c66-d190-531299fb7b42@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:50:33 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
swkhack <swkhack@...il.com>,
"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
在 2019/11/20 上午12:44, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 07:57:04AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 08:23:17PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>> +static inline struct lruvec *lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page,
>>> + struct pglist_data *pgdat, unsigned long *flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
>>> +
>>> + return lruvec;
>>> +}
>>
>> This should be a macro, not a function. You basically can't do this;
>> spin_lock_irqsave needs to write to a variable which can then be passed
>> to spin_unlock_irqrestore(). What you're doing here will dereference the
>> pointer in _this_ function, but won't propagate the modified value back to
>> the caller. I suppose you could do something like this ...
>
> This works because spin_lock_irqsave and local_irq_save() are
> macros. It boils down to '*flags = arch_local_irq_save()' in this
> function, and therefor does the right thing.
>
> We exploit that in quite a few places:
>
> $ git grep 'spin_lock_irqsave(.*\*flags' | wc -l
> 39
>
Yes, thank you all for point this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists