linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] reset: Do not register resource data for missing resets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f5edcd3d1f8b196a4de584d935636a4b5b247121.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:43:15 +0100
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] reset: Do not register resource data for missing
 resets

Hi Geert,

thank you for the patches!

On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 15:26 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When an optional reset is not present, __devm_reset_control_get() and
> devm_reset_control_array_get() still register resource data to release
> the non-existing reset on cleanup, which is futile.
> 
> Fix this by skipping NULL reset control pointers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index ca1d49146f611435..55245f485b3819da 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ struct reset_control *__devm_reset_control_get(struct device *dev,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	rstc = __reset_control_get(dev, id, index, shared, optional, acquired);
> -	if (!IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> +	if (rstc && !IS_ERR(rstc)) {

Could you change this to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL, both here and below?

>  		*ptr = rstc;
>  		devres_add(dev, ptr);
>  	} else {
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ devm_reset_control_array_get(struct device *dev, bool shared, bool optional)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	rstc = of_reset_control_array_get(dev->of_node, shared, optional, true);
> -	if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> +	if (!rstc || IS_ERR(rstc)) {
>  		devres_free(devres);
>  		return rstc;
>  	}

Same for patch 3, which otherwise looks fine.

regards
Philipp