[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191120150732.GE4007@krava>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:07:32 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/12] perf stat: Use affinity for opening events
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 09:52:26PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
SNIP
> + if (second_pass) {
> + /*
> + * Now redo all the weak group after closing them,
> + * and also close errored counters.
> + */
> +
> + evlist__for_each_cpu (evsel_list, i, cpu) {
> + affinity__set(&affinity, cpu);
> + /* First close errored or weak retry */
> + evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, counter) {
> + if (!counter->reset_group && !counter->errored)
> + continue;
> + if (evsel__cpu_iter_skip_no_inc(counter, cpu))
> + continue;
> + perf_evsel__close_cpu(&counter->core, counter->cpu_iter);
> + }
> + /* Now reopen weak */
> + evlist__for_each_entry(evsel_list, counter) {
> + if (!counter->reset_group && !counter->errored)
> + continue;
> + if (evsel__cpu_iter_skip(counter, cpu))
> + continue;
why staring at this I wonder why can't we call perf_evsel__close_cpu in
here and remove the above loop? together with evsel__cpu_iter_skip_no_inc
function
jirka
> + if (!counter->reset_group)
> + continue;
> +try_again_reset:
> + pr_debug2("reopening weak %s\n", perf_evsel__name(counter));
> + if (create_perf_stat_counter(counter, &stat_config, &target,
> + counter->cpu_iter - 1) < 0) {
> +
> + switch (stat_handle_error(counter)) {
> + case COUNTER_FATAL:
> + return -1;
> + case COUNTER_RETRY:
> + goto try_again_reset;
> + case COUNTER_SKIP:
> + continue;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + counter->supported = true;
> }
> }
> - counter->supported = true;
> + }
SNIP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists