[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121073152.GB24024@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:31:52 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
phil@...pberrypi.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 05:17:03PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> TBH I can't see it being a massive problem even if the DMA patch, driver
> and DTS patch went entirely separately via the respective DMA, PCI, and
> arm-soc trees in the same cycle. Bisecting over a merge window is a big
> enough pain in the bum as it is, and if the worst case is that someone
> trying to do that on a Pi4 has a wonky PCI controller appear for a couple
> of commits, they may as well just disable that driver for their bisection,
> because it wasn't there at the start so can't possibly be the thing they're
> looking for regressions in ;)
Agreed.
Nicolas, can you send a respin? That way I can still queue it up
for 5.5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists