[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hJ6gHX=NYz-CoXFSrN93HUT+Xh+DP+QAjzqgGmmghmGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:32:16 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio pmem: fix async flush ordering
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:23 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:26 AM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> writes:
> >
> > > Remove logic to create child bio in the async flush function which
> > > causes child bio to get executed after parent bio 'pmem_make_request'
> > > completes. This resulted in wrong ordering of REQ_PREFLUSH with the
> > > data write request.
> > >
> > > Instead we are performing flush from the parent bio to maintain the
> > > correct order. Also, returning from function 'pmem_make_request' if
> > > REQ_PREFLUSH returns an error.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> >
> > There's a slight change in behavior for the error path in the
> > virtio_pmem driver. Previously, all errors from virtio_pmem_flush were
> > converted to -EIO. Now, they are reported as-is. I think this is
> > actually an improvement.
> >
> > I'll also note that the current behavior can result in data corruption,
> > so this should be tagged for stable.
>
> I added that and was about to push this out, but what about the fact
> that now the guest will synchronously wait for flushing to occur. The
> goal of the child bio was to allow that to be an I/O wait with
> overlapping I/O, or at least not blocking the submission thread. Does
> the block layer synchronously wait for PREFLUSH requests? If not I
> think a synchronous wait is going to be a significant performance
> regression. Are there any numbers to accompany this change?
Why not just swap the parent child relationship in the PREFLUSH case?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists