[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <177371e7-9f52-407c-4f9b-ec9efb15f4a8@web.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:40:39 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] exfat: add super block operations
…
> +++ b/fs/exfat/super.c
…
> +static int __init init_exfat_fs(void)
> +{
…
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + exfat_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("exfat_inode_cache",
> + sizeof(struct exfat_inode_info),
> + 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
> + exfat_inode_init_once);
> + if (!exfat_inode_cachep)
> + goto shutdown_cache;
Should such an error code assignment be performed only after a failed function call?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists