[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6e71e7b-b708-211c-24b7-8ffe03a52842@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:04:51 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmattson@...gle.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, alazar@...defender.com,
edwin.zhai@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/9] vmx: spp: Add control flags for Sub-Page
Protection(SPP)
On 19/11/19 09:49, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_FLEXPRIORITY ( 8*32+ 2) /* Intel FlexPriority */
> #define X86_FEATURE_EPT ( 8*32+ 3) /* Intel Extended Page Table */
> #define X86_FEATURE_VPID ( 8*32+ 4) /* Intel Virtual Processor ID */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SPP ( 8*32+ 5) /* Intel EPT-based Sub-Page Write Protection */
Please do not include X86_FEATURE_SPP. In general I don't like the VMX
features word, but apart from that SPP is not a feature that affects all
VMs in the same way as EPT or FlexPriority.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists