[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191121100510.7gdcx7c3qom2f3wo@steredhat>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:05:10 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] vsock: add local transport support
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 09:46:43AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle
> > local communication.
> > This could be useful to test vsock core itself and to allow developers
> > to test their applications without launching a VM.
> >
> > Before this series, vmci and virtio transports allowed this behavior,
> > but only in the guest.
> > We are moving the loopback handling in a new transport, because it
> > might be useful to provide this feature also in the host or when
> > no H2G/G2H transports (hyperv, virtio, vmci) are loaded.
> >
> > The user can use the loopback with the new VMADDR_CID_LOCAL (that
> > replaces VMADDR_CID_RESERVED) in any condition.
> > Otherwise, if the G2H transport is loaded, it can also use the guest
> > local CID as previously supported by vmci and virtio transports.
> > If G2H transport is not loaded, the user can also use VMADDR_CID_HOST
> > for local communication.
> >
> > Patch 1 is a cleanup to build virtio_transport_common without virtio
> > Patch 2 adds the new VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, replacing VMADDR_CID_RESERVED
> > Patch 3 adds a new feature flag to register a loopback transport
> > Patch 4 adds the new vsock_loopback transport based on the loopback
> > implementation of virtio_transport
> > Patch 5 implements the logic to use the local transport for loopback
> > communication
> > Patch 6 removes the loopback from virtio_transport
> >
> > @Jorgen: Do you think it might be a problem to replace
> > VMADDR_CID_RESERVED with VMADDR_CID_LOCAL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> >
> > Stefano Garzarella (6):
> > vsock/virtio_transport_common: remove unused virtio header includes
> > vsock: add VMADDR_CID_LOCAL definition
> > vsock: add local transport support in the vsock core
> > vsock: add vsock_loopback transport
> > vsock: use local transport when it is loaded
> > vsock/virtio: remove loopback handling
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 +
> > include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets.h | 8 +-
> > net/vmw_vsock/Kconfig | 12 ++
> > net/vmw_vsock/Makefile | 1 +
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 49 +++++-
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 61 +------
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 3 -
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 2 +-
> > net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 10 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>
> Please see my comments. Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Thanks!
I'll send a v2 following your comments.
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists