[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b0da087-8ce0-2b01-5a1a-4d8c5f319d33@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:38:18 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmattson@...gle.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, alazar@...defender.com,
edwin.zhai@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] mmu: spp: Add SPP Table setup functions
On 19/11/19 09:49, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> +static int is_spp_shadow_present(u64 pte)
> +{
> + return pte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> +}
> +
This should not be needed, is_shadow_present_pte works well for SPP PTEs
as well (and in fact you're already using it here and there, so it's
confusing to have both).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists