lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0101016ea17feb57-32ad658c-6c87-413b-93c4-b4a015a02499-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:39:05 +0000
From:   cang@...eaurora.org
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] scsi: ufs: Do not clear the DL layer timers

On 2019-11-25 15:22, Avri Altman wrote:
>> >
>> > During power mode change, PACP_PWR_Req frame sends
>> PAPowerModeUserData
>> > parameters (and they are considered valid by device if Flags[4] -
>> > UserDataValid bit is set in the same frame).
>> > Currently we don't set these PAPowerModeUserData parameters and
>> > hardware always sets UserDataValid bit which would clear all the DL
>> > layer timeout values of the peer device after the power mode change.
>> >
>> > This change sets the PAPowerModeUserData[0..5] to UniPro specification
>> > recommended default values, in addition we are also setting the
>> > relevant
>> > DME_LOCAL_* timer attributes as required by UFS HCI specification.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
> BTW, I noticed that you are only updating the TC0 registers.
> Why not setting the TC1 registers as well?
> 
> Thanks,
> Avri

Hi Avri,

In the HCI spec, it goes

Currently, UFS uses TC0 only. Therefore, setting the following values 
are not needed:
 DME_ Local_FC1ProtectionTimeOutVal
 DME_ Local_TC1ReplayTimeOutVal
 DME_ Local_ AFC1ReqTimeOutVal

Best Regards,
Can Guo.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ