| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:22:51 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loop: avoid EAGAIN, if offset or block_size are
changed
Hi Bart,
On 11/25, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/25/19 9:59 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 11/19, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 5/17/19 5:53 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > This patch tries to avoid EAGAIN due to nrpages!=0 that was originally trying
> > > > to drop stale pages resulting in wrong data access.
> > > >
> > > > Report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=938958#c38
> > >
> > > Please provide a more detailed commit description. What is wrong with the
> > > current implementation and why is the new behavior considered the correct
> > > behavior?
> >
> > Some history would be:
> >
> > Original bug fix is:
> > commit 5db470e229e2 ("loop: drop caches if offset or block_size are changed"),
> > which returns EAGAIN so that user land like Chrome would require enhancing their
> > error handling routines.
> >
> > So, this patch tries to avoid EAGAIN while addressing the original bug.
> >
> > >
> > > This patch moves draining code from before the following comment to after
> > > that comment:
> > >
> > > /* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
> > >
> > > Is that comment still correct or should it perhaps be updated?
> >
> > IMHO, it's still valid.
>
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Thank you for the additional and very helpful clarification. Can you have a look at the (totally untested) patch below? I prefer that version because it prevents concurrent processing of requests and syncing/killing the bdev.
Yeah, I thought this was much cleaner way, but wasn't sure it could be doable
to sync|kill block device after freezing the queue. Is it okay?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH] loop: Avoid EAGAIN if offset or block_size are changed
>
> After sync_blockdev() and kill_bdev() have been called, more requests
> can be submitted to the loop device. These requests dirty additional
> pages, causing loop_set_status() to return -EAGAIN. Not all user space
> code that changes the offset and/or the block size handles -EAGAIN
> correctly. Hence make sure that loop_set_status() does not return
> -EAGAIN.
>
> Fixes: 5db470e229e2 ("loop: drop caches if offset or block_size are changed")
> Reported-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> Reported-by: grygorii tertychnyi <gtertych@...co.com>
> Reported-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 35 +++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 739b372a5112..48cfc8b9c247 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1264,15 +1264,15 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + /* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
> + blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> +
> if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
> lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
> sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device);
> kill_bdev(lo->lo_device);
> }
>
> - /* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
> - blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> -
> err = loop_release_xfer(lo);
> if (err)
> goto out_unfreeze;
> @@ -1298,14 +1298,6 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
>
> if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
> lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
> - /* kill_bdev should have truncated all the pages */
> - if (lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
> - err = -EAGAIN;
> - pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
> - __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
> - lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
> - goto out_unfreeze;
> - }
> if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit)) {
> err = -EFBIG;
> goto out_unfreeze;
> @@ -1531,39 +1523,26 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
>
> static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
> {
> - int err = 0;
> -
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> if (arg < 512 || arg > PAGE_SIZE || !is_power_of_2(arg))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> +
> if (lo->lo_queue->limits.logical_block_size != arg) {
> sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device);
> kill_bdev(lo->lo_device);
> }
> -
> - blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> -
> - /* kill_bdev should have truncated all the pages */
> - if (lo->lo_queue->limits.logical_block_size != arg &&
> - lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
> - err = -EAGAIN;
> - pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
> - __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
> - lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
> - goto out_unfreeze;
> - }
> -
> blk_queue_logical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, arg);
> blk_queue_physical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, arg);
> blk_queue_io_min(lo->lo_queue, arg);
> loop_update_dio(lo);
> -out_unfreeze:
> +
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int lo_simple_ioctl(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned int cmd,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists