[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191125192456.GA46001@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:24:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/iopl changes for v5.5
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest x86-iopl-for-linus git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-iopl-for-linus
>
> # HEAD: e3cb0c7102f04c83bf1a7cb1d052e92749310b46 x86/ioperm: Fix use of deprecated config option
>
> This tree implements a nice simplification of the iopl and ioperm code
> that Thomas Gleixner discovered: we can implement the IO privilege
> features of the iopl system call by using the IO permission bitmap in
> permissive mode, while trapping CLI/STI/POPF/PUSHF uses in user-space if
> they change the interrupt flag.
>
> This tree implements that feature, with testing facilities and related
> cleanups.
Forgot to list the conflicts that may arise if you merge this after the
other x86 bits.
Firstly the symbol bits would conflict here:
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S
I've resolved them in tip:WIP.x86/asm if you want to double check:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.x86/asm
but usually you do the resolutions better. :-)
There's also a conflict in arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32_types.h.
But there's also a semantic conflict that would trigger if you pull this
after the x86/urgent bits, interacting with:
05b042a19443: ("x86/pti/32: Calculate the various PTI cpu_entry_area sizes correctly, make the CPU_ENTRY_AREA_PAGES assert precise")
After that commit the CPU_ENTRY_AREA_PAGES value has to be precise, and
edited to 41 in the merge commit if I did everything write with the pull
requests.
This too is resolved in tip:WIP.x86/asm, in the following merge commits:
22d7b9359a9a: ("Merge branch 'x86/iopl' into x86/asm, to resolve conflicts")
7543765dd362: ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/iopl, to resolve conflicts")
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists