[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9txFZ+sCXXV3WA0CtFjsmLrY7qziJqrGfr1h+5B-fsqWRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:13:16 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 5.5-rc1
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:55, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:37:06 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > And apparently nobody bothered to tell me about the semantic conflict
> > > with the media tree due to the changed calling convention of
> > > cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister(). Didn't that show up in linux-next?
> >
> > I can see no mention of it, I've got
> >
> > Hans saying
> >
> > "This will only be a problem if a new CEC adapter driver is added to the media
> > subsystem for v5.5, but I am not aware of any plans for that." when I
> > landed that
> > in my tree, but I assume the ao-cec change in the media tree collided with it.
> >
> > But I hadn't seen any mention of it from -next before you mentioned it now.
>
> See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191014111225.66b36035@canb.auug.org.au/
Indeed, the misc team didn't remention that to me, when I pulled their
tree, perhaps I should make them do so, not sure why my search
yesterday failed to find this in my inbox.
Thanks,
Dave.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists