linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for 5.5-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191129105323.4ff56629@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:53:23 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 5.5-rc1

Hi Dave,

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:13:16 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:55, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:37:06 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:  
> > >  
> > > > And apparently nobody bothered to tell me about the semantic conflict
> > > > with the media tree due to the changed calling convention of
> > > > cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister(). Didn't that show up in linux-next?  
> > >
> > > I can see no mention of it, I've got
> > >
> > > Hans saying
> > >
> > > "This will only be a problem if a new CEC adapter driver is added to the media
> > > subsystem for v5.5, but I am not aware of any plans for that." when I
> > > landed that
> > > in my tree, but I assume the ao-cec change in the media tree collided with it.
> > >
> > > But I hadn't seen any mention of it from -next before you mentioned it now.  
> >
> > See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191014111225.66b36035@canb.auug.org.au/  
> 
> Indeed, the misc team didn't remention that to me, when I pulled their
> tree, perhaps I should make them do so, not sure why my search
> yesterday failed to find this in my inbox.

It was form Oct 14 ... I should have resent it earlier this week (or
last) as a reminder.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped